Municipal deputies also have no business in aggressor states! For the fifth year now, russia continues its bloody and senseless war against Ukraine, yet we still have municipal deputies in Latvia who regularly travel to russia and belarus, especially from Suverēnā Vara / Jaunlatvieši. What exactly are they doing there and what interests do they represent here? That is why, together with colleagues from the @Jauna_Vienotiba faction @patmalnieksj@AgneseKrasta@a_latkovskis and @aseradens, we have drafted a bill that also prohibits municipal deputies from going back and forth to aggressor states. I hope the Saeima majority will support this bill tomorrow!
Austošā Saule Latvijai · ASL valdes priekšsēdētājs
Tweet
I wrote to the VDD about Ragozin some time ago regarding the laundering of the propaganda piece "Azov pulka starptautiskie sakari" created in Moscow through Re:Baltica. I don't seem to have received a response, but the grounds for including him on the "black list" have existed for a long time. Anti-Ukrainian tweets are an expression of a sense of impunity. This is a matter of national self-respect. Stop dodging, @Braze_Baiba
Today many patriots, for example @RitaEvaNa and others, will be thoroughly disappointed in Foreign Minister @Braze_Baiba, who hopes to play the fool and not put the Kremlin's nightingale Rogozin on the "black list". On the other hand, it is time to get used to the idea that @Braze_Baiba is like @AndrisSpruds No. 2 - endless imitation of activity to sabotage the achievement of an important result....
Today the Komsomol girl @Braze_Baiba is playing the fool, having forgotten that the foreign minister has been granted unique powers to include Russian influence agents in the "black list" precisely for POLITICAL reasons. She herself recently included, for example, Artemy Lebedev (the Kremlin allowed that), who has an IDENTICAL function to @leonidragozin, who is an even higher-class disseminator of Kremlin narratives than the blue-haired clown Lebedev. What is the difference between these two Kremlin lackeys? None. Only that the Kremlin's permission for the demonstrative inclusion of Ragozin in the "black list" has not yet been received (too valuable an asset)....
What are you poking around there? Better sing! Those are the phrases I most often read on the internet regarding @partijaMMN. So I, too, better or a bit hoarse (I've been coughing for about a week...🙂) will sing tomorrow evening in Rēzekne. No tickets or complimentary tickets will need to be shown! https://t.co/iUC0GSxKEX
For four months I have been raising this issue with you and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs that, according to the assessment of the competent authorities, this step must be taken by the foreign minister under the conditions of Section 104, Paragraph 1, Clause 1 of the Immigration Law. If you have an assessment from even one competent authority that the interior minister can include this particular person on the "black list", then send it to me. I will gladly do it already today!
However, as far as I know, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs does not have such an assessment that the aforementioned person can be included on the "black list" by the interior minister.
the talk is about Ragozin, the great friend of the Rečekists, but Braže seems not to know the laws: Article 104 does not stipulate that... besides, the TUA, whose owner is the aforementioned bigwig, must be renewed every year, and that would be a good reason not to renew it https://t.co/rYh3kQMlrP
Today at the meeting of the National Council on Disability Affairs, together with representatives of state institutions and non-governmental organizations, we discussed a number of important issues:
- introduction of assistive technologies in educational institutions;
- improvement of e-health functionality;
- accessibility of housing and the environment;
- availability of the environment and services.
Thank you all for your work and suggestions!
@ijabs, @attistibai, a candidate for the 15th Saeima elections, says in TV24's programme "Pre-election debates. Fight for Latvia" that giving up the Green Course would mean a step back from a modern economy, while stressing that restrictions on forestry should be introduced thoughtfully, preserving the role of forests in Latvia's economy.
📍A fragment from the pre-election debate programme series "Pre-election debates. Fight for Latvia". Watch the full debate recording: https://t.co/TvnMoJW2wd
📍All candidate lists registered for the 15th Saeima elections participate in TV24's pre-election debates.
📍The project "Pre-election debates. Fight for Latvia" is funded by the Media Support Fund from the Latvian state budget. AS "TV Latvija" is responsible for the content of the programme "Pre-election debates. Fight for Latvia". #SIF_MAF2026
@Talis_L That will be decided by the voters. The fact is that I have not started any quarrel with the persons you mentioned; after the sanctions it was Mr. Kulbergs, and today Mr. Dombrava.
❗️❗️❗️Both @Apvienotais_ and @AndrisKulbergs should clearly state which side of the lake shore they are on - together with employer organizations demanding that cheap labor from Uzbekistan be allowed in and Turība University, which profits from training Pakistanis, or with 🇱🇻 the Latvian people, who demand an end to immigration! You cannot sit in the middle of the lake and hope the shores will connect by themselves.
#ImigrantiemNē
‼️ Again, migrant-based business is being lobbied behind the scenes, and again the adoption of anti-immigration decisions is being stalled both in the Cabinet of Ministers and in the Saeima! 🤯 This is already symptomatic! https://t.co/JPpiNMQylC
"Mēs mainām noteikumus" wants to end party funding from the state budget. However, if after the elections the funding is to come to themselves, it does not intend to refuse it, says Jāzeps Baško, explaining why the party would use money whose allocation it itself opposes.
▶️ Watch "Nākamais, lūdzu!": https://t.co/VJt8jlHIsG#SIF_MAF2026
Why is the current coalition slowing down measures to reduce migration? First, the review of Dombrava’s own plan was postponed, and now 2 concrete action measures have already been put in the drawer: about universities and Uzbekistan... https://t.co/Z90VXECtNF
For four months I have been raising this issue with you and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs that, according to the assessment of the competent authorities, this step must be taken by the foreign minister under the conditions of Section 104, Paragraph 1, Clause 1 of the Immigration Law. If you have an assessment from even one competent authority that the interior minister can include this particular person on the "black list", then send it to me. I will gladly do it already today!
However, as far as I know, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs does not have such an assessment that the aforementioned person can be included on the "black list" by the interior minister.
Given that the Ministry of the Interior has issued a residence permit in Latvia to the Russian citizen mentioned by the minister, the decision is within the competence of the Minister of the Interior under Article 104 of the Immigration Law. I would advise the minister not to evade responsibility a few days before the elections. https://t.co/Xy9iPTWdbQ