Latest posts

16805
TVNET (RU)
Article

Union of Greens and Farmers against new state investments in airBaltic

BudgetInvestments
Andris Kulbergs (@AndrisKulbergs)
APVIENOTAIS SARAKSTS - Latvijas Zaļā partija, Latvijas Reģionu Apvienība, Liepājas partija · Ministru prezidents
Tweet

Day No. 58 in the prime minister's chair (Friday) - DeFacto; Bank of Latvia; Aglona; Auto Union V16...

BudgetInvestmentsSocial supportDigitalization
Ēriks Stendzenieks (@E_Stendzenieks)
Rīgas domes deputāts
Reply

I am noting that you will be in the City Council on September 7 at 12:00, in room 511, I happen to have my monthly individual meetings with Riga residents there, each one, especially, one by one. Reports on what has been done, answers to questions, plans and so on. Because it cannot be that you just mess around on Twitter...

@Prusis @E_Stendzenieks He can talk a lot, but what has he done in Riga City Council?

Open referenced post
TV3 Ziņas (@TV3zinas)
Komerctelevīzijas ziņas
Tweet

Zaļzemnieki will not vote in favor of support for airBaltic, but there should be enough votes in the Saeima.

BudgetInvestments
Baiba Braže (@Braze_Baiba)
Jaunā VIENOTĪBA · Ārlietu ministre
Retweet

Foreign Minister @Braze_Baiba meets with the candidate for UN 🇺🇳 Secretary-General and Guyana's Permanent Representative to the UN, Carolyn Rodrigues-Birkett, to discuss her vision for the UN's future, the necessary reforms, and the Secretary-General's role in strengthening international peace and security. The confirmation process for the tenth UN Secretary-General, for a five-year term (2027–2031), is planned to begin in late 2026. The current UN SG António Guterres has been in office since 1 January 2017; his term will end on 31 December 2026. 📸 Flickr album: https://t.co/ppt6bzrLed

Open referenced post
Baiba Braže (@Braze_Baiba)
Jaunā VIENOTĪBA · Ārlietu ministre
Retweet

Thank you, dear @Braze_Baiba, for your warm words. I deeply value our friendship - both personal and between our nations. Looking forward to continuing our close work together for a secure, free, and prosperous future for our peoples.

Open referenced post
Ansis Pūpols (@AnsisPupols)
Rīgas domes deputāts
Reply

@AndrisKulbergs @Rajevskis @AndrejsJudins @prokuratura_LV That could be this summer's party hit 'Andrejs goes solo' https://t.co/jwtSCLR1bP

Maybe you will finally talk with your own JV party leaders and learn all the info — whoever asks this question gets answers.... all the answers and explanation have already been provided. Start finally talking inside JV, otherwise it is unclear whether anyone at all controls the party for you, or everyone is going solo.

Open referenced post
Guntars Vītols (@guntarsv)
APVIENOTAIS SARAKSTS - Latvijas Zaļā partija, Latvijas Reģionu Apvienība, Liepājas partija · Ekonomists (FM ministra birojs)
Quote

It's been a while since I've talked about economics, there's no time for it, so Sunday lessons are currently skipped. But here a person has written a good summary, you can read, remember, reflect. I'll highlight one quote: "Every price control, every subsidy, every centrally administered minimum wage policy ignores the basic principles of economics and results in wreckage." This is something almost no one in Latvia understands. A large part of the budget troubles, the overwhelming part, lies in this misunderstanding.

Here are the most important lessons from the Austrian School of Economics in one post: The entire edifice of modern economic policy rests on a lie: that a group of planners can manage an economy better than the people living in it. Start with value. Nothing has value in the abstract. You value a glass of water differently when you're drowning than when you're dying of thirst in the Sahara. Value lives inside individual human minds, not in objects, not in labor hours, not in government decree. Every price control, every subsidy, every centrally administered wage floor ignores this and produces predictable wreckage. Money didn't come from a government committee. It emerged spontaneously from markets, as traders across centuries converged on commodities like gold and silver because they held value across time and space. Governments didn't invent money; they hijacked it. Inflation is the expansion of the money supply itself. Rising prices are the symptom. When the Federal Reserve expanded its balance sheet from roughly $4 trillion to nearly $9 trillion between 2020 and 2022, the price explosion that followed wasn't a mystery. It was the direct, mechanical consequence of that expansion. The Fed caused it. Prices do something irreplaceable: they transmit information across millions of actors simultaneously. When lumber prices spiked in 2021, builders across North America cut waste and sought alternatives without a single bureaucrat issuing a memo. No central planner can replicate that signal, because no central planner possesses the knowledge embedded in it. This connects directly to the knowledge problem. You know your neighborhood, your suppliers, your customers, your own tolerance for risk. Your competitor knows his. A bureaucrat in Washington knows none of it. The knowledge required to run an economy is dispersed, personal, and contextual. It cannot be extracted, aggregated, and fed into a planning model. The Soviet Union ran that experiment for seventy years and produced chronic shortages of basic goods. Bad businesses must be allowed to fail. When they fail, they release labor, capital, and resources to producers who will use them more effectively. When Washington handed General Motors $49.5 billion in 2009 to prevent exactly that process, it kept misallocated capital locked inside a failing structure and punished every competitor who had managed their business responsibly. Every function government performs, a voluntary market arrangement performs better: faster, cheaper, and responsive to actual human preferences rather than political incentives. Education, roads, security, dispute resolution, all of it. Government agencies face no profit and loss signal, no competition, and no mechanism to reward performance. They optimize for budget preservation and political survival, and the people using the service have no exit option. The political class and the central banking apparatus that sustains it are the villains. Both benefit directly from the idea that expert management beats voluntary exchange. They will not surrender that idea willingly. What would you add?

Open referenced post
Budget
TVNET (RU)
Article

Kuļbergs: Europe will pay in euros, otherwise Latvia will pay with people

Defense
Jāzeps Baško (@JazepsBasko)
Mēs mainām noteikumus · MMN ģenerālsekretārs
Retweet

Latvia is unique in a sense - one state 'monopoly enterprise' combines both state supervision functions such as driving exams, registers, tax and fine collection, and commercial services such as technical inspection and production of number plates. Although this did not promote competition, it was once emphasized that CSDD as a state-owned monopoly would not require control as elsewhere in the EU to ensure that service centres comply with vehicle technical inspection criteria. Admittedly, there is no significant difference in accidents caused by technically damaged cars or in the legitimacy of taking exams between Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Technical defects of vehicles in all Baltic states cause only a few percent of all serious accidents. Although private driving with a parent is more common and legally simpler in neighbouring countries, the percentage of passing the practical exam on the first attempt is similar to Latvia. From a competition point of view, this model is an exception in the Baltic and Nordic region, as the Competition Council has repeatedly pointed out. Meanwhile, the Ministry of Transport and CSDD maintained 'high quality, uniform standard and corruption prevention' as the main argument for not opening the market. It was also mentioned that this allows faster and more efficient introduction of innovations and digital tools. Like Estonia and Lithuania, CSDD also carries out road safety campaigns, to which around €400,000 per year is allocated; most of the funding goes to outdoor advertising and TV. However, neighbouring countries have almost completely abandoned roadside outdoor advertising. In Lithuania and Estonia, campaigns are considered an educational supplement and are synchronized with infrastructure improvements. Comparing the number of fatalities, Estonia and Lithuania have better statistics. Particular progress is seen in Lithuania, associated with the reconstruction of dangerous intersections and the introduction of automated control tools. The total registration and inspection fee in the Baltics is comparable, but tax policies differ. For example, Lithuania has no annual tax for individuals, while Latvia and Estonia must pay a road tax every year. In Estonia it is collected by the tax authority, in Latvia through the CSDD network. The free market in Lithuania provides the lowest service costs, while Estonia stands out with the most effective campaigns. There are almost twice fewer road fatalities than in Latvia. However, it is not the case that we lag behind everywhere. Maintaining top management costs Latvian taxpayers the most, and in this respect we are leaders. We have the most paid managers - both the board and the council. The state company's turnover in 2024 was €62.87 million, and net profit was €2.67 million. Board and council remuneration costs reached €625,095, which is 0.99% of the company's annual turnover and 23.4% of net profit, excluding transport and other administrative support costs. Lithuania lags behind in management costs, while the most modest are the Estonians, where the industry is managed by a general director without a council.

Open referenced post
BudgetBureaucracyInfrastructure
Kārlis Seržants (@karlis_serzants)
APVIENOTAIS SARAKSTS - Latvijas Zaļā partija, Latvijas Reģionu Apvienība, Liepājas partija · Politiķis un žurnālists
Tweet

CSDD, it seems, expensive highway poster campaigns have been the priority - over eight years (2021-2027) they have been allocated 2.8 million euros. Almost the same as the Latvian bank's fuss with jubilee coins...

Budget
TVNET (RU)
Article

“Political boarding houses”: Kulbergs criticized the management of state enterprises

Bureaucracy
Māris Mežals (@maris_mezals)
LATVIJA PIRMAJĀ VIETĀ · EP deputāts
Reply

@maris_spruds @Lato_Lapsa @guntarsv Exactly, it has long not been any national company!

@guntarsv It may be that it is important. But as long as the ticket reservation platform does not belong to AirBaltic, but partially belongs to Gausa's company (and most likely he is also able to control/disable it if he wants), any money should not be pushed into that so-called 'national airline'.

Open referenced post
Investments
Filips Rajevskis (@Rajevskis)
Politiskais analītiķis
Retweet

‼️✈️ Tomorrow the Saeima will have to decide whether to allow the government to once again save AirBaltic and invest money in it: A) Yes, the opportunity to fly is worth it B) No, flights can also be provided by other foreign airlines C) Tax money should be invested in sectors important to society. https://t.co/lcEbAGVh1d

Open referenced post
BudgetInvestments
Oļegs Burovs (@burovs_olegs)
Zaļo un Zemnieku savienība · Valsts pārvaldes komisijas priekšsēdētājs
Tweet

‼️✈️ Tomorrow the Saeima will have to decide whether to allow the government to once again save AirBaltic and invest money in it: A) Yes, the opportunity to fly is worth it B) No, flights can also be provided by other foreign airlines C) Tax money should be invested in sectors important to society. https://t.co/lcEbAGVh1d

BudgetInfrastructure
Filips Rajevskis (@Rajevskis)
Politiskais analītiķis
Retweet

Maybe you will finally talk with your own JV party leaders and learn all the info — whoever asks this question gets answers.... all the answers and explanation have already been provided. Start finally talking inside JV, otherwise it is unclear whether anyone at all controls the party for you, or everyone is going solo.

Open referenced post