From@AndrisKulbergsDay No. 76 in the prime minister's seat (Tuesday) – Cabinet meeting already with -1 minister 😏 I returned from Lapland, but the Cabinet of Ministers has become one minister smaller during this time. 🏛️ Cabinet meeting – getting more and more amusing. The approach of elections can already be felt in almost every coalition partnership. The first government meeting with -1 minister – Uzulnieks is replaced by Augulis, but since Valainis is on a business trip, Augulis actually represented as many as 3 ZZS ministries today. 😄 🌾🚂🇷🇺 grains and Latvian farmers' exports We adopted a decision to increase the railway infrastructure fee for 🇷🇺 grain cargo. Our priority – export of Latvian farmers' products and the competitiveness of our own entrepreneurs. 📏 60 m² of land and the absurdity of bureaucracy Today I learned about yet another bureaucratic nonsense. The state is disposing of 60 m² of land, for which the owner is paid approximately €23, because that is the value of the land. But to carry out this transaction: ➖️ an appraisal costs about €200–300; ➖️ land surveying – another €1000–2000; ➖️ additionally, surveyor costs come on top. This is total nonsense. I tasked the Minister of Justice, Mr. Smiltēns, to immediately look for a solution and remove this unnecessary bureaucracy in cases where such small plots of land are involved. 🚌 €9.8 million to intercity bus operators We adopted a decision to pay bus operators €9.8 million in debt for intercity bus services. This problem has been dragging on unresolved for more than the tenure of two transport ministers of the previous government. At the same time, I tasked the Minister of Transport to bring a long-term solution already in October. Companies must know under what rules to work and how to plan their business further – they cannot live in uncertainty every year. 🎙️ LDDK/LTRK prime ministerial debates @AlvisHermanis1 did not come to the debate. Pity, because this was the right place to defend your ideas and position. I specifically wanted to hear: ➖️ what his plan for Latvia's economic growth is; ➖️ how to attract more investment; ➖️ how to increase Latvia's exports. I also find interesting the publicly voiced reproaches to LDDK and @LTRK_uznemeji about labor migration. Here, however, one should rely on facts, not loud slogans. 📊 Looking at the data on the so-called "pseudo student" problem, it is concentrated in specific universities – and @RostovskisA Turība is not among them. Whereas @darbadeveji itself does not in any way promote illegal migration. Also, for example, the Karavela led by @AndrisBite employs third-country workers legally and in a relatively small volume – mainly because in Latvia there simply are not people willing to do such physically demanding work. 👉 Migration must be discussed seriously. But more importantly – based on data, facts, and the real situation, not statements.
Open referenced post
Migration: Posts and News mentioning Apvienotais saraksts
Political posts and news in Migration that mention Apvienotais saraksts, from monitored Latvian public sources.
BNN Focus | Political party review: National Alliance – from the 'hard electorate' to the fight for its niche
From@JankaPipars1Kulberg longs to bring such into Latvia https://t.co/mUJF7z2xi6
Open referenced post
The director has finally found the right topic to speak about. Unfortunately, if you put a pearl on top of a pile of crap you made yourself, the overall impression is still crappy.
From@AlvisHermanis1Kulbergs has a solution. We learned that yesterday. Immigration. On the third of October there will be a Latvian people's referendum on suicide - do we do it or not?
Open referenced post
Kulbergs has a solution. We learned that yesterday. Immigration. On the third of October there will be a Latvian people's referendum on suicide - do we do it or not?
From@LV_visiem@AndrisKulbergs @AlvisHermanis1 Mr. Puče should have invited @RaivisZeltits and the party @austsaule - they would not have been afraid to tell the truth to the migration lobbyists in the name of narrow and short-term interests. LATVIA DOES NOT NEED MIGRATION FROM THE 3RD WORLD! https://t.co/MnpHzCikp4
Open referenced post
WE DON'T WANT MIGRANTS Watching how on TV24's circle of opinion coincidences the main importers of immigrants – Kulbergs, Rostovskis and Bite – are self-satisfied, while mocking Hermanis's refusal to discuss obviously unsupportable proposals, I was amazed at the constant display of engagement. One must be either (A) an astonishing fool, (B) a mercenary unscrupulous person, (C) an enemy of the Latvian people, to support any, controlled or uncontrolled, immigration from third-world countries after the rapes, bombings, filth, diseases and contraband that immigrants have shown in Western Europe. In the current demographic situation, this is a "to be or not to be" question. No numbers or other economic world data outweigh security. That must not be bargained over. Initially I hoped Kulbergs would be a true reformer, but it seems he is an effective continuator of the work started by Siliņa. Her male copy. Instead of creating a national economic tax model that promotes local employment and the opportunity to earn for both entrepreneurs and employees, he proposes to compensate unbearable burdens with imported Central Asians. With such a vision, we will soon become a colony of Uzbekistan, and Riga – Samarkand.
@Kiborgzzz @AndrisKulbergs We'll see in 2 weeks.
From@Kiborgzzz@poznaks @AndrisKulbergs How is the halt of Russian grain transit going? Kulberg's actions in this matter look more like preserving that grain transit rather than the opposite.... The immigration issue is also more rhetoric and putting spokes in Dombrava's wheels....
Open referenced post
Such a rapid 're-painting' as demonstrated by @AndrisKulbergs is hard to even imagine. @Apvienotais_ calls itself a conservative force, but Kulbergs' actions show the opposite - support for third-country immigration, support for the Istanbul Convention that undermines the institution of marriage, and circumvention of Article 110 of the Satversme in the name of same-sex marriage. How does AS even differ from @Jauna_Vienotiba, or has it always been just a convenient continuation of Unity's policy under a different name?
From@LZilvinskisOn October 3, 2026, the Saeima elections will take place. For the first time, I have gone from being a voter to a candidate, and I am pleased that in Latvia there is a party for which conservative values and nationalism are not just an election slogan but the reason for its founding. In the two previous elections, I voted for parties that promised to protect conservative values. Eight years ago I trusted JKP, four years ago the United List. However, the Partnership regulation was adopted, the Istanbul Convention was ratified, and the promises remained where they were made: before the elections. After this disappointment, I got tired of waiting for someone else to fulfill what was promised. So in 2024 I joined the association 'Austošā Saule', because I knew that its goal was to become a party. Before that, I checked who these people were and found idealists for whom Latvia is not a four-year project but a home built for generations. I was present when the association became a party on 23 August 2025, the only truly new party in these elections. Over these years I have fallen in love with the nationalism of small nations, because it is not directed against others but is an unwavering will to exist. The preamble of the Constitution states that the Latvian state was created to guarantee the existence of the Latvian nation, its language and culture through the centuries. In 1989, when I was born, Latvians were only 52% in their own land; this year we are about 63%. Latvia is the only place in the world where the Latvian people and language are at home: if there are fewer of us here, there will be no other place in the world where we could become more. The promise of the Constitution does not fulfil itself; it is fulfilled by people in the Saeima. Therefore, 'Austošā Saule Latvijai' offers not slogans but concrete steps: - defend the interests of Latvians as the state nation, strengthen the Latvian language and the Latvian cultural environment; - promote the emigration of third-country immigrants and make the residence permit issuance procedure stricter, while other parties only promise to fight illegal immigration; - prevent the spread of Islamism; - amend Article 110 of the Constitution so that the foundation of the family is the marriage of a man and a woman, blood kinship or adoption; - gradually end the Partnership institution, while other so-called conservative parties stop at the promise of not allowing same-sex marriage; - withdraw from the Istanbul Convention and fight domestic violence with national laws and crisis centres; - ensure that families return to the countryside and new farms are created; - actively participate in NATO and remain in the European Union as a community of national states, so that conservative values have a voice in it. These goals are achievable by legal means, but parties tend to stumble in implementing them. I have a master's degree in law from the University of Latvia and thorough knowledge of constitutional law, so I will help turn the goals of the ASL programme into laws that will be written to withstand the review of the Constitutional Court. If you support national and conservative values, and if you truly care about family, nation and state, then on 3 October put the ballot for list 12 in the envelope. May a morning dawn over Latvia in which Latvians as the titular nation are a stable majority in their own land!
Open referenced post
From@LV_visiem@AndrisKulbergs @AlvisHermanis1 Mr. Puče @ArmandsPuce should have invited @RaivisZeltits and the party @austsaule to a discussion - they would not have been afraid to tell the truth to migration lobbyists in the name of narrow and short-term interests. LATVIA DOES NOT NEED MIGRATION FROM THE 3RD WORLD! https://t.co/MnpHzCikp4
Open referenced post
What did Braže discuss with the US special envoy?
Regarding taxes - logically, they must be paid. It is a matter of self-respect and honor towards oneself and society. But we must remember that national borders have long ceased to exist when we talk about e-residency. Choices can be varied where to base oneself. US companies settle in Ireland, for example.
From@VisockisJuris@CerinsAivis @jautaa_veel @AndrisKulbergs @AlvisHermanis1 @RostovskisA @AndrisBite Accepting such (low IQ, chaotic) migration as a fact is surrender. It should not be regulated post factum, but must be COMPLETELY STOPPED until there is clear regulation, quotas, and full control of the situation. Do you admire those who do not pay taxes🇱🇻 but continue to use infrastructure? Like migrants.
Open referenced post
From@Lato_Lapsa“Migration, that’s what bothers him…” Vote for Kulbergs - and you’ll get back the same Unity cancer.
Open referenced post
@VisockisJuris @jautaa_veel @AndrisKulbergs @AlvisHermanis1 @RostovskisA @AndrisBite For clarity, I am very conservative against migration from third world countries. We must accept the fact that it exists and decide together how to regulate it for our own good. Taxes can be paid wherever one wants nowadays. They can also reside in another country if anything.
From@VisockisJuris@CerinsAivis @jautaa_veel @AndrisKulbergs @AlvisHermanis1 @RostovskisA @AndrisBite And? Paying taxes is the DUTY of entrepreneurs! And the JRT building is a better use of tax money than benefits/healthcare for third world scum, Alberta street NGOs and 'refugee' housing, which also costs millions! You really have very little clarity in your head, which we already saw in the video with Kramiņu.
Open referenced post
You, @AndrisKulbergs, women like you, you are handsome, you speak English convincingly and, in my observation, you are hyperactive and tireless. Tireless until you start calling names at an elementary school level. There's that classic question about going on a reconnaissance together... @partijaMMN
From@JazepsBaskoThe Prime Minister goes to a debate, where it is planned that his two main allies in pushing immigration will friendly interrogate him, and now in a midnight tweet he shows annoyance that the person who simply says a political 'no' to immigration has not responded to the role of punching bag in these debates. Facts are needed. The main fact is that MMN is against immigration. Against mosques. Against electrified hordes of camels on our streets and lives. Against the settlement of a foreign civilization in Latvia. Against rapes, against dirt, against not reckoning with those around us. Read 'The Strange Death of Europe'. Or 'The Holy Camp'. Go to any Christmas market in European big cities. Study the 'facts' of Europe's loss. And we are against the dynamic that a local entrepreneur would rather hire a slave from elsewhere than innovate or cooperate with the local workforce, which also cares about its homeland. The return of politics means exactly that. That you can choose. You can be for and you can be against. And fundamental things do not need to be defended with facts. If you defend something with facts, you are already operating in some inarticulate framework of rationality that does not respect your values. But here we are talking about the very foundation of the nation's existence. The sanctity of human life is not defended with facts. And similarly, the sanctity of home is not defended with facts. It is no longer a home if strangers come in and start running things. Latvia is our only home. Can technocrats accept that for some of their plans, a democratic society has a simple 'no, thank you'?!
Open referenced post
From@MiezisA@AndrisKulbergs @AlvisHermanis1 'premier' for a small country and nation that has been dying out for decades sees no problem in migration. ...that's how we die out. Maybe you should go back to car trading? Yes? No?
Open referenced post
“Migration, that’s what bothers him…” Vote for Kulbergs - and you’ll get back the same Unity cancer.
From@AndrisKulbergsInteresting that the biggest bearer of change @AlvisHermanis1 is able to declaim change on Facebook, but not defend ideas in the prime minister debates. Migration, you see, bothers him... Rostovskis and Bite are supposedly the main culprits in migration... but the 'famous' director has no facts, no data, no evidence, only fake claims. I defended and explained AS plans and ideas, but the director got scared...
Open referenced post
Before disparaging entrepreneurs, it should be noted here that @RostovskisA and @AndrisBite pay several million in taxes every year. With what money was the JRT building built, remind me? It is simply necessary to sort out/align migration policy and stop Latvians from tearing each other apart 🫡🤝
From@jautaa_veelFacts, data and evidence for what @AlvisHermanis1 said is that Rostovskis and Bite make a lot of money from migrant import and residence permit trade. Such 'experts' are on the same level as the pro-Kremlin three-musketeer organizations of Alberta Street 13 and Raubiško. Importing migrants from Russian satellites is a crime against Latvia, it is happening right before our eyes.
Open referenced post
✊ @partijaMMN https://t.co/rHFtlR9Fzk
From@AlvisHermanis1Overnight Kulbergs tweeted: Interesting that the biggest bearer of change @AlvisHermanis1 is able to declaim change on Facebook, but not to defend ideas in prime minister debates. Migration, you see, bothers him... Rostovskis and Bite are supposedly the main culprits in migration... only the "famous" director has no facts, no data, no evidence, only fake claims." TV24 invited me to participate in a show where LTRK (the chamber of medium-sized entrepreneurs) head Rostovskis and LDDK (the association of large entrepreneurs) head Bite would interrogate and question prime minister candidates. Knowing that both are especially responsible for dragging immigrants into Latvia, I found this format unacceptable and I declined. Rostovskis regularly travels to India to organize Indian "students" for his family business, which is the university "Turība", while Bite is famous for recruiting Central Asian slaves for his own business. That, of course, is cheaper than paying local normal wages or modernizing technology. So I did not go to the TV24 show, which was hosted by Armands Puče (whom, by the way, I greatly respect and recommend everyone read his latest book "Traitor" (using Munter's example to better understand modern Latvia's tragedy)), but I did watch the show. To my surprise, Kulbergs was there, where all three complimented each other and rejoiced in one another. That Kulbergs himself comes from the LDDK organization, we of course know. And it also becomes clearer why a few weeks ago he rudely attacked the Interior Minister Dombrava over radical restriction of immigration. The TV24 show ended with the logos of both sponsors. LDDK and LTRK.
Open referenced post