From@MurnieksAGo ahead and vote for the communists from @Apvienotais_ and you will be canceled, imprisoned, or slaughtered before breakfast. 🤨 /and don't say later that you weren't warned!/ https://t.co/zJTsgaEObt
Open referenced post
Posts and News mentioning Apvienotais saraksts
Political posts and news mentioning Apvienotais saraksts from monitored Latvian public sources.
@karlis_serzants @Apvienotais_ Which party has the justice minister? What exactly legal steps has @EdvardsSmiltens taken to find out why the process is dragging, and to ensure it doesn't drag?
From@karlis_serzants@Lato_Lapsa @Apvienotais_ This is my absolutely personal opinion, Lato! Thieves should sit in prison regardless of party affiliation, and in this case a very simple court process has been dragging on for the seventh year…
Open referenced post
@Lato_Lapsa @Apvienotais_ This is my absolutely personal opinion, Lato! Thieves should sit in prison regardless of party affiliation, and in this case a very simple court process has been dragging on for the seventh year…
From@Lato_LapsaIf you needed one more confirmation before the elections that @Apvienotais_ is a disguised communist plague and the cancer of Unity.
Open referenced post
If you needed one more confirmation before the elections that @Apvienotais_ is a disguised communist plague and the cancer of Unity.
From@karlis_serzantsIt's a pity that the court lacks state thinking, because there was a chance to cancel Brēmanis before the elections. Well, nothing, they can also imprison a Saeima deputy...
Open referenced post
@KucinskisM Vote for Kulbergs, get Truksnis 🫠
From@KucinskisMOh, by voting for Valainis, do you get Tavars as a package? #tikaijautāju
Open referenced post
Kulberg's visit to Pärnu against the backdrop of Nepal events has raised confusion; office provides explanation
From@RKruminMany Latvians are in the propaganda trap of the ruling parties! It doesn't matter whether to vote for JV, PRO, AS, LPV and also NA, because they provide no real Latvianness, only talk! Look at the votes in the Saeima and Riga City Council! Only ASL can reduce the number of immigrants and Russians! https://t.co/dKIiycDPnv
Open referenced post
@runasvirs @Apvienotais_ I would recommend checking the news date... 2023.
From@runasvirs@AndrisKulbergs @Apvienotais_ Corruption, mysterious bonuses and premiums, impotence of some institutions, the inflated number of civil servants, etc. As far as I understand, has that been resolved?
Open referenced post
@aldis_voitenko @Apvienotais_ Please look at the date... that was 3 years ago, when I was a deputy
From@aldis_voitenko@AndrisKulbergs @Apvienotais_ I understand that car matters are close, but the prime minister has more state affairs.. When starting to lead, there was a pile of promises!!
Open referenced post
(2/2)🧵 Wait, stop. Do you consider us 'retards'? 107 thousand is OK, but less than 200 TUA per year, which is 0.15%, is a national security risk? The fact that we are full of poor 'blacks' about whom nobody in this country knows when they have to leave, when they arrived, etc. — that of course is different. But checking 150 people — that is a national security risk? Really? But we don't end there. Like in a good French restaurant, the best is always reserved for dessert. ☝🏻For health, benefits and legal support of third-country nationals we currently spend 100 million per year!!! (See image.) Wait, that can't be — we are against money that rich people want to invest here (not from Russia or Belarus), but at the same time we spend 100 million a year on existing third-country nationals? That can't be, right? But it can. It can be… As they say, away with golden visas and rich people, we stick with the poor and 'boltists'... And today Siliņa in all seriousness asked this question to Smiltēns…😳
From@Chapis(1/2)🧵 Pre-election agitation time is an interesting time, and I was greatly surprised when Mrs. Siliņa today in the debate asked Mr. Smiltēns a question about "golden visas". Which in essence is a glorified name for the temporary residence permit that has already been operating in one way or another since 2011. 🤦♂️🤦♂️ And here I would like to touch a bit on this public debate, and I think it's worth looking at this issue in essence. Let's start with what the opponents say. Both Edvīns Šnore and deputy Agnese Krasta, and even Edvīns Inkēns have been very critical about this issue in public space. In their opinion, it was a very unsuccessful program that is a threat to Latvia's security and society as a whole. Okay. Let's look at the data. A brief history. The TUA (temporary residence permit) started operating on 1 July 2010. Until Russia's attack on Ukraine (24 February 2022), the investor TUA program had attracted approximately 1.59 billion euros in Latvia. Methodologies vary, but conservatively you can multiply this number by 1.5 — direct taxes, services, etc., i.e., what additionally came into the economy. Most of the money came in 2010–2014 while the threshold for real estate was low. After the increase in requirements in 2014 (up to €250,000 for property) the flow dropped dramatically. Since Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the program has practically completely stopped (completely for Russian and Belarusian citizens). And good that — I have no claims against that. If we talk about recent years, I will quote a letter from the Latvian Real Estate Transactions Association addressed to the president: "We draw your attention that the current Immigration Law provides the possibility for citizens of third countries (except Russian and Belarusian citizens) to receive a residence permit based on the acquisition of real estate. In our opinion, this contributes to the real estate market, as transactions are made in the expensive property segment (from €250,000). From each transaction a state fee is also paid in the land register (1.5% of €250,000 is €3,750). Additionally, each investor pays 5% of the purchase price for granting the residence right, which is at least €12,500. Such foreign investments in real estate also create additional demand for services of local companies, namely, various engineers, construction, design, interior design, carpentry, metalworking and other craftsmen's work, as well as increase demand for construction materials, interior and locally produced goods." "…in order to receive the first temporary residence permit, in 2025 49 payments were made with a total amount of €750,054.25 (for transactions of approximately €15 million). For receiving repeated temporary residence permits for previously purchased real estate or for registering them (as of 12 October 2025 for 2025) within the same program, 89 payments were made with a total amount of €375,000." So 49 new applications and 89 extensions!!! In context, that's about 1/2 of the number of apartments sold in a Bonava project in Pierīga. There are also opponents who believe that this will affect apartment prices, i.e., apartments will become more expensive and less accessible to local buyers. Currently Riga has by far the lowest real estate prices in the Baltics. And when I say "by far", that's an understatement. In the secondary market in Riga's micro-districts, prices are often about 2–2.5 times lower than in Vilnius and about half lower than in Tallinn. On the other hand, according to Global Property Guide 2026 data. Tallinn ~3,100, Vilnius ~3,060, Riga ~2,650.. Obviously, there is absolutely zero correlation with TUA, but a huge connection with Vilnius's fintech ecosystem and general economic activity in the capitals of our neighboring countries. I won't even mention the premium segment, it is said that in Vilnius it has already reached ~€7,000 per square meter. But let's continue about security. Personally, I follow the Donbrava investigative commission very actively. According to his words (see image), ~107 thousand third-country citizens currently reside in Latvia.
Open referenced post
(1/2)🧵 Pre-election agitation time is an interesting time, and I was greatly surprised when Mrs. Siliņa today in the debate asked Mr. Smiltēns a question about "golden visas". Which in essence is a glorified name for the temporary residence permit that has already been operating in one way or another since 2011. 🤦♂️🤦♂️ And here I would like to touch a bit on this public debate, and I think it's worth looking at this issue in essence. Let's start with what the opponents say. Both Edvīns Šnore and deputy Agnese Krasta, and even Edvīns Inkēns have been very critical about this issue in public space. In their opinion, it was a very unsuccessful program that is a threat to Latvia's security and society as a whole. Okay. Let's look at the data. A brief history. The TUA (temporary residence permit) started operating on 1 July 2010. Until Russia's attack on Ukraine (24 February 2022), the investor TUA program had attracted approximately 1.59 billion euros in Latvia. Methodologies vary, but conservatively you can multiply this number by 1.5 — direct taxes, services, etc., i.e., what additionally came into the economy. Most of the money came in 2010–2014 while the threshold for real estate was low. After the increase in requirements in 2014 (up to €250,000 for property) the flow dropped dramatically. Since Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the program has practically completely stopped (completely for Russian and Belarusian citizens). And good that — I have no claims against that. If we talk about recent years, I will quote a letter from the Latvian Real Estate Transactions Association addressed to the president: "We draw your attention that the current Immigration Law provides the possibility for citizens of third countries (except Russian and Belarusian citizens) to receive a residence permit based on the acquisition of real estate. In our opinion, this contributes to the real estate market, as transactions are made in the expensive property segment (from €250,000). From each transaction a state fee is also paid in the land register (1.5% of €250,000 is €3,750). Additionally, each investor pays 5% of the purchase price for granting the residence right, which is at least €12,500. Such foreign investments in real estate also create additional demand for services of local companies, namely, various engineers, construction, design, interior design, carpentry, metalworking and other craftsmen's work, as well as increase demand for construction materials, interior and locally produced goods." "…in order to receive the first temporary residence permit, in 2025 49 payments were made with a total amount of €750,054.25 (for transactions of approximately €15 million). For receiving repeated temporary residence permits for previously purchased real estate or for registering them (as of 12 October 2025 for 2025) within the same program, 89 payments were made with a total amount of €375,000." So 49 new applications and 89 extensions!!! In context, that's about 1/2 of the number of apartments sold in a Bonava project in Pierīga. There are also opponents who believe that this will affect apartment prices, i.e., apartments will become more expensive and less accessible to local buyers. Currently Riga has by far the lowest real estate prices in the Baltics. And when I say "by far", that's an understatement. In the secondary market in Riga's micro-districts, prices are often about 2–2.5 times lower than in Vilnius and about half lower than in Tallinn. On the other hand, according to Global Property Guide 2026 data. Tallinn ~3,100, Vilnius ~3,060, Riga ~2,650.. Obviously, there is absolutely zero correlation with TUA, but a huge connection with Vilnius's fintech ecosystem and general economic activity in the capitals of our neighboring countries. I won't even mention the premium segment, it is said that in Vilnius it has already reached ~€7,000 per square meter. But let's continue about security. Personally, I follow the Donbrava investigative commission very actively. According to his words (see image), ~107 thousand third-country citizens currently reside in Latvia.
What do you want? Everything is in force! No coat of arms license plates? Get lost! Wait another three years! The initiative is what matters!🤡
From@AndrisKulbergs@axe_lv And? This is valid, nothing needs to be done there. The next number plate procurement is in 2029.
Open referenced post
From@jautaa_veel@tikums @zvejniekameita Rail Baltica 20k Kitija's husband Mareks Gruškevics is now Kulbergs' office manager. That's how things are done. https://t.co/zICP3NGZ0O https://t.co/Qe1fWAyyUg
Open referenced post
And still being prepared? The giver.🤡 This person is a d...er, not a doer. Remember that at the elections. https://t.co/O0ixHvBRHe
From@AndrisKulbergsMarking Latvia's holidays on November 18, I wanted to give all Latvian car and motorcycle drivers an initiative from me and @Apvienotais_ to introduce the Latvian coat of arms on our country's vehicle license plates. With the aim of strengthening Latvia's image and promoting vehicle owners' sense of belonging to the the country, together with CSDD amendments to legislation are being prepared so that the national coat of arms would be included on Latvian vehicle registration plates. The design and specification will be refined, the picture is only for illustration.
Open referenced post
From@axe_lvSoon it will be three years since this deputy Kulbergs' post, but instead of the promised gift, the state in the person of CSDD will collect all vehicle owners' data. Just wanted to remind about the promises.. https://t.co/u7I9GhgOKl
Open referenced post
From@Aivars_Jurkalns@Kuskis @guntarsv @AndrisKulbergs You are like a child who in your naivety speaks about the goal (where you are completely right—that way it is destruction). But for the decision-makers the main goal is the road and the acquisition of money in it. Therefore nothing can and will be changed. We will all go. The state will acquire. Parties will earn and share.
Open referenced post
From@bizenajs_V2I would like to ask @AndrisKulbergs to devote less than an hour of his precious time and to get acquainted with, for example, Madona municipality's civil defense plan. Maybe he can give an assessment of whether that is what should be in that plan. Because I found conditionally useful information there in the last 5-7 pages. https://t.co/Fouv5C1fdW
Open referenced post
The new Liepāja prison has been built in accordance with Latvian and international requirements, and its purpose is not only to keep people behind closed doors but to ensure safe, lawful, and resocialization-oriented execution of sentences, comments the Minister of Justice Edvards Smiltēns (AS) regarding the prisoners' hunger strike. https://t.co/GJ7QDO1CFf
From@ltvzinasThe Liepāja prison is the most modern and safest in the Baltic states. Officials describe it as a new prison. However, several inmates transferred there from Jelgava have complaints, and they have started a hunger strike. The main objections are that walking opportunities are limited and ventilation is poor. The prison administration denies this. 🖥️ https://t.co/jM17tYLWbr
Open referenced post
From@EdvardsSmiltensAbout the Liepāja prison 'hunger strike'! Prisoner complaints are being checked, their rights are respected, but the public also needs to know and understand the full picture. On Monday, seven convicts refused the food provided by Liepāja prison. On Friday, there were four. At the same time, these people shop at the prison store and consume food they have purchased themselves. So this is not about dozens of people actually starving, but about refusing the food offered by the prison. Walks in the fresh air are provided in accordance with regulations – not less than one hour per day. Air quality in cells is ensured by mechanical ventilation. The system meets the requirements, maintenance is performed, and no defects have been found. Prisoners' objections are actually about the fact that cell windows cannot be opened. That is not a construction error, but a deliberate security solution to prevent unauthorized communication between cells, the circulation of prohibited items, and other manifestations of prison subculture. The new Liepāja prison is built according to Latvian and international requirements. Its purpose is not just to keep people behind closed doors, but to ensure a safe, lawful and resocialization-oriented execution of sentences. Resistance to the new order was predictable. Some prisoners are accustomed to the old prison environment and its informal rules. Refusing prison food, resocialization measures, or other forms of collective protest are one way to try to achieve the restoration of the old order. The prison administration continues a dialogue with prisoners and checks each specific complaint. If any deficiency is found, it will be addressed. However, the state will not back down from security requirements and the goal of reducing the influence of prison subculture. The human dignity and rights of prisoners must be respected. At the same time, lawful execution of sentences and public safety are not negotiable.
Open referenced post
As we discussed with employers today. We have a bunch of laws and regulations that require allocating funding to various sectors as a certain % of GDP. And there, when adding up, about one billion euros is missing. For a long time. That is on top of the already existing deficit (borrowed money) of 2 billion per year. It will never be fulfilled, even theoretically impossible. Such regulations should be thrown in the trash. There is a list.
From@KuskisParties that do not make such a budget correction are leading Latvia to destruction. At least a 30% cut in the bureaucratic service, as well as reduced state intervention in business. Also culture and sports. The state does not owe athletes. @guntarsv give 'chainsaws' to ministers to sharpen. Also @AndrisKulbergs https://t.co/r17V5J9i8B
Open referenced post