Political posts and news mentioning Apvienotais saraksts from monitored Latvian public sources.
From@EriksZarahovicsThe greatest responsibility for this is borne by Rinkēvičs, Kariņš and co, who planned the immoral deal that allowed the progressives to mess with Latvia for 3 years.
Open referenced post
Smiltēns demands an explanation from judge Rincis regarding possible violence against his wife.
@VeikoSpolitis @KNABinforme @prokuratura_LV @Jekaba11 @CVK_zinas @lasilvportals @Jauna_Vienotiba @VL_TBLNNK @attistibai @Progresivie @Apvienotais_ Clarity is also needed as to why this was noticed only now and only after publicity...
From@VeikoSpolitisIf @KNABinforme & @prokuratura_LV cannot find a solution, then how legal are @Jekaba11 #Vēlēšanas2026? Will AS, LA, NA, JV, ZZS, LPV really accept that a purple creature with half a million Russian euros does what it wants with @CVK_zinas? https://t.co/5SLrs4m8ex via @lasilvportals https://t.co/mejKFcF4Ic https://t.co/S4KLGM1V7c
Open referenced post
From@Lato_LapsaIt seems that Zemgale Regional Court judge Raimonds Rinčs may have beaten his wife – Jelgava City Council lawyer Lelde Rinča, even while drunk. And where is the Istanbul Convention? And why are all the Dombravas and Smiltēns so quiet, so quiet this time? And why aren't Beate's handbags crying? https://t.co/44gSlb7LeB
Open referenced post
@guntarsv @realNepareizais, he added https://t.co/HIQOf2QK00
From@guntarsvShut up, communist. The state is not a milk cow. These are expenditures for defense, health, education. All from VAT and excise.
Open referenced post
@Janis1983 @guntarsv @realNepareizais Everyone knows: low taxes are communism, but high and progressive ones are right-wing radical capitalism.
From@Janis1983@guntarsv @realNepareizais Was that sarcasm?
Open referenced post
A perfectly good and precise detailed plan, also mentioning the names of @Progresivie's second-echelon strivers. Adding to the author. No one says the Archer is bad. It's simply too expensive for us. Paraphrasing @AndrisKulbergs's quote: 'We want to ride in a Bentley, but the money is for a Škoda.' https://t.co/e3tiseneNd
From@taisniba_comWe will tell the whole truth about @Progresivie's affair with the procurement of the artillery system 'Archer'. In a normal country @AndrisSpruds would have been in prison long ago, but here it's not customary. About everything in order. The NBS defines the need for newer and more modern artillery systems. Research takes place and NBS specialists recognize the Czech company's 'Morana' as the best and most advantageous. What does Sprūds do? He makes the NBS opinion be reworked and under political pressure the Swedish 'Archer' is recognized as the 'best'. NBS commander Pudāns shows he is a weak rag and cannot resist the demands of the communist Sprūds. What will this commander do when the war starts? Then Sprūds orders his minions in the ministry to prepare the necessary documents for an official decision. They are prepared by Sprūds's party's placements in the defense ministry - Uģis Norītis and Rolands Heniņš. Both are deputy state secretaries and loyal progressives. The ministry makes the decision and sends it to the Cabinet of Ministers, where it is also approved. Why is the 'Archer' procurement unprofitable and even harmful for the Latvian state? First, the price, which is disproportionately expensive. The Swedes could not even name a final price during these three years, but according to preliminary calculations, one artillery vehicle would have to be paid well over 10 million euros, and that is an inadequate sum. In the end, the procurement of artillery vehicles would be well over 100 million euros. Moreover, the costs of maintenance, training and the artillery shells themselves are not yet known. Together it would be well over 100 million euros. Secondly, deadlines. The Swedes are still NOT able to deliver 'Archer'. Possibly it would only be after several years, but Latvia needs it NOW. The Swedes wanted to palm off the old 6x6 'Archer' to Latvia, while they would produce the needed 8x8 vehicles after many years. An absolutely unprofitable deal. Thirdly, ammunition. The 155mm artillery ammunition (NATO standard) available to the NBS is NOT suitable for 'Archer'. It would have to be bought from those same Swedes for many millions of euros, because it is specific ammunition suitable ONLY for 'Archer' vehicles. Again a completely unprofitable deal. Fourthly, industry. Latvia requires that part of the artillery vehicles be produced in Latvia (similar to 'Patria'), but the Swedes cannot ensure that. Thus, Latvia's economic benefit from this deal is a complete zero. Unprofitable. 'Progresīvie' whine that these artillery vehicles have 'proven themselves' in Ukraine. That's nonsense. Yes, the Swedish government donated 'Archer' to the Ukrainian army and they were, of course, accepted, because Ukrainian forces lack armor. The Ukrainian army said they would not buy such vehicles with their own money because they are too expensive and have many flaws. The Ukrainians themselves can produce 'Bogdana' artillery vehicles, which are not worse and are many times cheaper. 'Progresīvie' say that Latvia must buy the Swedish 'Archer' because Swedish soldiers are 'protecting' Latvia. 'Progresīvie' lie again. The Swedes have sent to Latvia a pathetic number of soldiers with even more pathetic combat equipment. In reality, Latvia is protecting Sweden, because when Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine began, the Swedes wet their pants and quickly ended their hypocritical 'neutrality' and joined NATO. The Swedes sent a small contingent to Latvia for form's sake. Then, when the big s--- from Russia will start, Latvia will take the first blow and we will be the ones protecting Sweden. Swedish defense minister Paul Jonson's wailing is completely unnecessary and this corrupt politician did not use the opportunity to keep quiet. Sweden would be better off thinking how to reform its dilapidated army, which consists of ONLY ~7000 professional soldiers (including various accountants, secretaries, guards and headquarters loafers). An important note about so-called strategic intergovernmental cooperation. In 1946, the Swedish government handed over 132 Latvian legionnaires to the USSR, who were then taken to USSR death camps and KGB prisons. The Swedes have already betrayed the Latvians once, and you can be sure - when the Russians try to come in here again, the soft Swedes will be the first to wet their pants and run home. Strategic cooperation is built on trusting relationships, but the Swedes have not proven they are reliable allies. All this shows how harmful 'Progresīvie' are to the Latvian state. These people lie, sabotage and undermine the Latvian state at every step.
Open referenced post
From@RKrumin@elitaveidemane @AndrisKulbergs It is one surprising story of how a bravado and promising blogger in less than 3 months turned into a likeness of the most unloved head of government in Latvian history. I guess it is luck for Latvia that his expiration date is not 4 years. https://t.co/1kQpKyel3r
Open referenced post
Finance Ministry raises alarm about Valka's finances, but the council is in no hurry to start the stabilization process
@elitaveidemane @AndrisKulbergs And what difference is there between JV and AS? 🤣
From@elitaveidemane@AndrisKulbergs do you support same-sex "marriage"? what makes you better than the "progressists" fools?
Open referenced post
From@elitaveidemane@AndrisKulbergs do you support same-sex "marriage"? how are you better than the dimwitted "progressives"?
Open referenced post
Where was the name-calling, typical internationalist? Yes, if an unpoliticized assessment were done on a homosexual couple, then it would be considered unfit for child adoption. The fact that you don't know that homosexuals use drugs and alcohol more than heterosexuals is your own problem. https://t.co/2EzFOqIVcw
From@AndisVaicTypical nationalist. There are no arguments, only name-calling without evidence. What are degenerate values? Where is the evidence about alcoholism and drug addiction? Simple claims that obviously ignore that before adoption each family is assessed.
Open referenced post
From@ltvdefactoIn January, the National Botanical Garden was added to the Nature Conservation Agency, promising less bureaucracy and more efficient management. Now, citing the same arguments, the new minister responsible for the sector, Edgars Tavars (AS), wants to separate the garden again. https://t.co/L2vrLTOEQR https://t.co/rUfs9BSz7w
Open referenced post
In January, the National Botanical Garden was added to the Nature Conservation Agency, promising less bureaucracy and more efficient management. Now, citing the same arguments, the new minister responsible for the sector, Edgars Tavars (AS), wants to separate the garden again. https://t.co/L2vrLTOEQR https://t.co/rUfs9BSz7w
Reform after reform: shortly after being merged, the Botanical Garden is already being separated from the Nature Conservation Agency
WATCH › Eurostat objections to Lithuania threaten the financing plan for the Selija base
Firstly, you asked me about the orphanage compared to a homosexual couple. Secondly, a homosexual couple could be as harmful, if not more harmful, an environment than an alcoholic family, because homosexuals more often than heterosexuals use alcohol and various kinds of drugs.
From@ziimulis5@zuravlevs @AndisVaic @asocgimene @AndrisKulbergs @Apvienotais_ @EdvardsSmiltens @Edgars_T Then you think it is better to leave a child with alcoholics than to give him to a wealthy foster family of that type which will take care of the child's future? Interesting indeed...
Open referenced post
From@katrinailjinska...almost as much as the Civic Alliance receives from the Cabinet of Ministers for recording the minutes of the Memorandum Council meetings in one year and getting together to talk with @AndrisKulbergs. That we can do. We cannot compensate a child for a rare disease medication that would return them to a full life – we have to collect donations. https://t.co/Y5zab5OLmm
Open referenced post
@ziimulis5 @AndisVaic @asocgimene @AndrisKulbergs @Apvienotais_ @EdvardsSmiltens @Edgars_T Yes, that is harm against a child. Equivalent to placing a child with drunkards.
From@ziimulis5@zuravlevs @AndisVaic @asocgimene @AndrisKulbergs @Apvienotais_ @EdvardsSmiltens @Edgars_T And do you think it is a terrible harm if, for example, children from an orphanage are given the opportunity to live in such a family?
Open referenced post
The Overton window is already here. First only register relationships, then already there is a demand to equate to marriage, then there will be a demand to adopt children.
From@ziimulis5@zuravlevs @AndisVaic @asocgimene @AndrisKulbergs @Apvienotais_ @EdvardsSmiltens @Edgars_T Do you think it will be like after the Overton window concept? In my opinion society here is very conservative for such normalization to happen.
Open referenced post