Political posts and news from Apvienotais saraksts among monitored Latvian public sources.
1320
Guntars Vītols (@guntarsv)
APVIENOTAIS SARAKSTS - Latvijas Zaļā partija, Latvijas Reģionu Apvienība, Liepājas partija · Ekonomists (FM ministra birojs)
Reply
I see this as the most essential problem, I defined it from the beginning. If the management of companies is not detached from the politburo, corruption and inefficiency will not diminish. There are two examples known worldwide. Singapore's Temasek (works excellently) and Malaysia's 1MDB, which ended with perhaps the biggest corruption scandal, the prime minister ended up behind bars. We need to seriously look towards eradicating Grafistāna at the root. The state capture structure overseen by Andris Grafs, the nightingale of Unity.
@guntarsv@JanisIkstens The larger and more centralized the structure, the greater the temptation to use it for political purposes ("eating" to support the state apparatus). Paradoxically, one large fund can be more easily politically influenced than several independent, separately regulated and transparent companies.
APVIENOTAIS SARAKSTS - Latvijas Zaļā partija, Latvijas Reģionu Apvienība, Liepājas partija · Ekonomists (FM ministra birojs)
Reply
Ben, thanks for the concern. The steam hasn't vanished anywhere – it just no longer goes through the whistle but into the cylinders. Two fresh tasks: bitcoin in the deferred tax regime for investment accounts has now reached Saeima – I personally unstuck the stagnation in the cabinets. Supervisory oversight of small lenders at the Bank of Latvia – Saeima just adopted it. Both had sat in bureaucrats' drawers for years. It's easier to express yourself on Twitter. Writing a line into law is harder. I am now doing the latter. And communists are still communists. Only now I meet them not on Twitter but at budget tables.
Watching politicians, one cannot help noticing that almost all of them live in their own bubbles of illusions. Moreover, they see other politicians' 'bubbles' perfectly, but not their own. Some examples. There are politicians who, as an axiom, as 'two times two is four', paint everything happening in Latvia in catastrophic colors. 'We are completely in the rear', 'standing at the edge of an abyss', 'rushing at full speed into a wall', 'we are last in all indicators' and so on. They do not even allow the possibility that maybe it is not so; that they themselves generate this apocalyptic view and further induce it into the surrounding space; that not everyone sees the surrounding world in such colors. Yes, many see significant shortcomings in our state administration and would like to change much, but in their deepest essence they do not feel 'standing at the edge of an abyss'. This is evidenced at least by the fact that, no matter how they are organized, urged and stimulated, they cannot be brought to an action - to save the country from falling into the abyss, let's join hands from Zilupe to Pāvilosta, as it was in the 'Baltic Way' on August 23, 1989 from Vilnius to Tallinn. I mention these past times not out of nostalgia, but to show the huge difference between real problems, real determination, and imitations of these problems, which Latvia's current political activists engage in. Currently, there is no issue in Latvian politics so decisive that it could gather even a couple of thousand people for some broader popular manifestation. Peculiarities of the 2026 Saeima elections, new features and general meaning - https://t.co/RvUSDIqguX via @nralv
Maybe the problem is not the lack of judges, but the overload of courts. In the field of criminal law, there is definitely excessive criminalization of offenses and the criminal process is too cumbersome and formal. https://t.co/PahRaY9AiD
...almost as much as the Civic Alliance receives from the Cabinet of Ministers for recording meetings of the Memorandum Council in one year and getting together with @AndrisKulbergs. That we can do.
Compensating a child for medication for a rare disease that would restore a full life – we cannot, donations must be collected. https://t.co/Y5zab5OLmm
I will gladly do it when I can. Meanwhile, you can ask your ex-minister about these 'strange' decisions and promises. About 3 lost years that were lost to national defense... I am at a loss for words... 🇺🇦 gives us the most precious = time to prepare, but you with your PRO 'politics' wasted it... why???, I still cannot understand
APVIENOTAIS SARAKSTS - Latvijas Zaļā partija, Latvijas Reģionu Apvienība, Liepājas partija · Ekonomists (FM ministra birojs)
Reply
It has been said, sometimes it gets mixed up, it happens. Seeing all that superhuman work intensity, I understand humanly. I also understand that now is the hottest pre-election period, everyone tries to extrapolate any clumsier expression to madness. It's not that you don't do it too. Just to catch a slip.
I can say concretely that the word 'privatization' has literally never appeared in my Development Fund plan.
APVIENOTAIS SARAKSTS - Latvijas Zaļā partija, Latvijas Reģionu Apvienība, Liepājas partija · Ekonomists (FM ministra birojs)
Reply
@ECapligina@IvarsAuzins The oil price is only about 25% of the fuel price, even now. The rest is the refining cost, currently abnormally/historically large (diesel refining capacity in Europe is maxed out), and of course taxes (about half the price at the pump). It's all piled up together.
@guntarsv@IvarsAuzins Unfortunately, the greed of the state machine and the absurdity of eco-ideology know no bounds. 10 years ago a barrel cost a bit less, but the price was around 1.37, now 15 USD more, and a whole 1 euro added to the price? Where does state price regulation begin and end? Something is not right...
APVIENOTAIS SARAKSTS - Latvijas Zaļā partija, Latvijas Reģionu Apvienība, Liepājas partija · Ekonomists (FM ministra birojs)
Reply
Privatization doesn't solve anything, because it is a one-time measure. You sell and drink away the money. You can sell something (for example, TET itself), or some building manager, but not privatization as an overarching motive. The most important goal in our envisioned Development Fund is to grow the value of the overall portfolio. Managing capital companies in the fragmented fiefdoms of ministries (shareholders) does not achieve this goal - each one pulls the blanket to their own side.
One of the reasons is communism. The idea that prices can be 'regulated'. In the stations that are empty, a maximum price was set. Workers happily ran and bought out.
It's like in Soviet times - Brezhnev set a price for sausage and there was no sausage in the store. But under the counter for market price it was. Here we have Valainis also wanted to regulate both sausage and fuel prices. Didn't succeed, so fuel is at gas stations 🤷🏻♂️
APVIENOTAIS SARAKSTS - Latvijas Zaļā partija, Latvijas Reģionu Apvienība, Liepājas partija · Ekonomists (FM ministra birojs)
Reply
One of the reasons is communism. The idea that prices can be 'regulated'. In the stations that are empty, a maximum price was set. Workers happily ran and bought out.
It's like in Soviet times - Brezhnev set a price for sausage and there was no sausage in the store. But under the counter for market price it was. Here we have Valainis also wanted to regulate both sausage and fuel prices. Didn't succeed, so fuel is at gas stations 🤷🏻♂️
APVIENOTAIS SARAKSTS - Latvijas Zaļā partija, Latvijas Reģionu Apvienība, Liepājas partija · Ekonomists (FM ministra birojs)
Reply
@IlzeZvidrina Both in Germany and France, as is known, isolationists are gaining ever greater popularity. Currently the next EU funds envelope looks as usual, but what will be after 7 years, one can only guess.
@guntarsv And FR is the second largest net contributor to the EU budget and a military power. Surely they will manage themselves, which could also mean they will no longer contribute to EU funds.
APVIENOTAIS SARAKSTS - Latvijas Zaļā partija, Latvijas Reģionu Apvienība, Liepājas partija · Ekonomists (FM ministra birojs)
Reply
A large part of school graduates are currently illiterate. They can't calculate and can barely read (spell out). Plus the old post-Soviet generation (Brezhnevists). This is a given, you simply have to take it into account.
@guntarsv Locals cannot see further than the price tag at the gas station. They think that fuel originates at the gas station and only the oil tycoons themselves decided to raise prices. When you tell them that there is a shortage in the world and the only solution is high prices or voluntary consumption reduction, they don't understand.
APVIENOTAIS SARAKSTS - Latvijas Zaļā partija, Latvijas Reģionu Apvienība, Liepājas partija · Ekonomists (FM ministra birojs)
Reply
@UldisVarnevichs The French basically opened the doors to their former colonies. Morocco, for example.
French was accordingly available, since it had already been taught, convenient. It was similar for another colonial empire – Britain, which at one point controlled 25% of the world.
Well, accordingly, whoever came, came.
APVIENOTAIS SARAKSTS - Latvijas Zaļā partija, Latvijas Reģionu Apvienība, Liepājas partija · Ekonomists (FM ministra birojs)
Quote
In France, 11% of fuel stations have no fuel at all. There are many more where either diesel or petrol is missing.
And the price in the rest is already approaching €2.50.
Meanwhile, local activists think even worse than excel. We'll reduce taxes, take from hospitals, and fuel will appear in gas stations cheaply.
As Brezhnev said, the economy must be economical.
BREAKING: France is running out of fuel. 11% of France's stations nationwide are now out of petrol or diesel, one in nine, with 16% of stations short in Grand Est, 15% in Pays de la Loire, 14% in Occitanie, and 13% in Centre-Val de Loire, per government figures published this morning.
The official count only registers a station as short if it has no petrol at all or no diesel at all, so a station out of one grade but holding another is not counted, meaning the real shortage is much larger. French diesel averages €2.406 a litre, about $10.45 a gallon.
Europe is facing its worst energy crisis in history.
APVIENOTAIS SARAKSTS - Latvijas Zaļā partija, Latvijas Reģionu Apvienība, Liepājas partija · Ekonomists (FM ministra birojs)
Reply
@Fertelis I really don't have time to campaign, I have a lot of interesting work. And I don't want to talk nonsense, share Lenin's speeches either. That's the only way to get votes. Colleagues put up one picture at the flea market 'Latgale', well then thanks for that! That's my 'campaign'😄 https://t.co/wDIlFK9TaB
A few observations on Russia’s election spectacle:
✅ Russia is a dictatorship. There are no free elections and no genuine domestic political process. The real opposition has been destroyed.
✅ Every party allowed into the “elections” plays a role assigned by the Kremlin. The result is scripted in advance. United Russia is expected to secure a constitutional majority.
✅ Turnout matters to the Kremlin. If 50% cannot be reached at the ballot box, the numbers can always be fixed on paper.
✅ The State Duma “elections” are illegitimate under international law because Russia is holding them in Ukrainian territories it temporarily occupies through its war of aggression. The free world should treat the resulting Duma accordingly and reject cooperation with it.
✅ Whatever happens on the ballot will not change Russia’s strategic course. Parliament and government do not make policy in Putin’s Russia. They implement the dictator’s will.
✅ The real question is mobilisation. Russia is suffering more killed and wounded in Ukraine than it can replace through recruitment. The coming months will show how far the Kremlin is prepared to go — including whether Moscow and St Petersburg will finally be asked to pay a greater human price.
✅ Russia’s economy is under growing pressure, but the regime can still sustain its war machine for the foreseeable future. These “elections” change nothing.
✅ Finally, the European context. Voluntarily voting in Russia’s “elections” means voting for the war and against peace. Russian citizens living in Europe who choose to participate are casting their votes in support of the war and against Europe’s security interests.
APVIENOTAIS SARAKSTS - Latvijas Zaļā partija, Latvijas Reģionu Apvienība, Liepājas partija · Biedrības 'Latvijas restarts' biedrs
Reply
@instant_mk Impressive is that finally there is a stance not to bend, but to buy what army professionals consider necessary. Currently we have a professional in the AM post, not Münchausen.
Second. In the Telia matter, what has been the Swedish position?
They are and remain our partners, but there must be a stance.
Such a statement from the Swedish Defense Minister is impressive.
Here, however, an explanation from the government would be required.
How and why was this contract broken?
Why were the Swedes let down? https://t.co/oTwDwhf3mN