Posts and News from Apvienotais saraksts

Political posts and news from Apvienotais saraksts among monitored Latvian public sources.

1320
Guntars Vītols (@guntarsv)
APVIENOTAIS SARAKSTS - Latvijas Zaļā partija, Latvijas Reģionu Apvienība, Liepājas partija · Ekonomists (FM ministra birojs)
Reply

@vlad_sok @andrislov They are Bolsheviks. Let's not confuse. They want to come and kill all the different ones the very next day. Changing the rules immediately and now is from Lenin's writings. Good choice, matches the contingent. I recommend voting!

@guntarsv @andrislov Then start showing results. Start chopping wood. Otherwise, in the end they will elect MMN and Jāzeps Baško, who has an identical view on reducing state administration.

Open referenced post
Guntars Vītols (@guntarsv)
APVIENOTAIS SARAKSTS - Latvijas Zaļā partija, Latvijas Reģionu Apvienība, Liepājas partija · Ekonomists (FM ministra birojs)
Reply

No. That is not the level of the civil service, by and large it's the coalition, but actually the Saeima. Also, you can't really take money away from any ministry, because funding is allocated according to the budget law. Only small amounts can be redistributed here and there, and even then with the ministry's consent (which is what happens).

@guntarsv @GirtsKarnitis Really can't reduce even one FTE in 4 months until the elections?

Open referenced post
Budget
Māris Kučinskis (@MarisKucinskis)
APVIENOTAIS SARAKSTS - Latvijas Zaļā partija, Latvijas Reģionu Apvienība, Liepājas partija · Finanšu ministrs
Tweet

I congratulate @LRApvieniba on the congress! You @Apvienotais_ brought something truly essential - people who know how state decisions look not only in Riga, in ministries, but also in regions, in people's everyday lives. People who know - talking is not enough, one must take responsibility and achieve results https://t.co/DtIMPbUGg4

Guntars Vītols (@guntarsv)
APVIENOTAIS SARAKSTS - Latvijas Zaļā partija, Latvijas Reģionu Apvienība, Liepājas partija · Ekonomists (FM ministra birojs)
Reply

Of course, I have always urged to do so. It won't save billions, but tens of millions. Maybe 100, but it must be done anyway. The problem is clearly visible on social media, the voice of the people. Whenever something happens, calls arise to regulate, control, punish. Asked and done. Additional controls and accordingly funding. None of this has come about without a voter mandate.

@guntarsv Reduce the number of state functions (mainly control over supervision etc.) by 30%. It will be possible to reduce the number of state employees, and business will be grateful (will develop better).

Open referenced post
BudgetBureaucracy
Guntars Vītols (@guntarsv)
APVIENOTAIS SARAKSTS - Latvijas Zaļā partija, Latvijas Reģionu Apvienība, Liepājas partija · Ekonomists (FM ministra birojs)
Reply

@Jaunumi_ 6.1 billion. You don't take into account the services provided by municipalities, for example. They are not in the special budget, they come from PIT, mostly go to the social sphere.

Stop rambling about 6 billion! Social budget expenditures this year are 5 billion, but revenues are 5.6 billion. The social budget always, every year, has a surplus! Good question, where does that surplus go? https://t.co/zXZHp1WBJg https://t.co/voL6XUtAor

Open referenced post
BudgetSocial support
Guntars Vītols (@guntarsv)
APVIENOTAIS SARAKSTS - Latvijas Zaļā partija, Latvijas Reģionu Apvienība, Liepājas partija · Ekonomists (FM ministra birojs)
Reply

@SancessRiks They know it well, because they have long been at the sharing of the cash box. They just didn't have the courage to say it, let alone act. The problem is well known, but solutions are considered political suicide.

@guntarsv Yes, yes - Siliņa already told this to Liepnieks yesterday.

Open referenced post
Guntars Vītols (@guntarsv)
APVIENOTAIS SARAKSTS - Latvijas Zaļā partija, Latvijas Reģionu Apvienība, Liepājas partija · Ekonomists (FM ministra birojs)
Reply

That's true, yes. From my taxes I have received practically only education services in my life. For myself and children. Not free, but still significant. I haven't seen free healthcare (but ears in the mirror though). In my time there was a plus - I also got very good education, now they only print diplomas🤡

Nearly 30 years of continuous work with honest tax payment, so I remember well that in 2004 the state support for three children was less than 23 lats and everything had to be paid for. At that time there wasn't even a state-funded dentist for children, and they made you bring toilet paper to school. In Liepāja, a large family with three children didn't count, and they also had to pay for school lunches. Only with my little daughter did we experience what 'mother's salary' means and we got a bit of the Honorable Family benefits, which were quickly taken away when the older ones grew up. God forbid we go to the theater with a discount. It's a pity that earlier the number of children was more often ridiculed than supported, although we didn't particularly expect or ask for it. But that doesn't cancel happiness. @E_Stendzenieks described it well; children are a monument to their parents. I understand that my taxes now help those who paid theirs and the little citizens who will later support me. That doesn't mean, however, that I will continue to accept that what I pay will be spent by various civic alliances and Riga hipsters with Palestinian flags.

Open referenced post
EducationHealth
Guntars Vītols (@guntarsv)
APVIENOTAIS SARAKSTS - Latvijas Zaļā partija, Latvijas Reģionu Apvienība, Liepājas partija · Ekonomists (FM ministra birojs)
Reply

That's how all democracies work, it's a peculiarity, a side effect of an otherwise excellent system. Everyone votes in elections only for their own pocket, and those who promise the most win. But on average it does nothing bad. First they divide up everything existing, then they borrow until they stop giving credit, then everything collapses, goes bust, the Great Mess sets in, and then it starts anew. Happy from illusions to bankruptcy and back to illusions. Smaller crises are where the state is relatively small compared to the private economy. In EU countries, the state's share is roughly half of the economy, so crises cannot be 'small'.

@guntarsv You only forgot to say that the states themselves created this problem. Everyone who, without anyone's control, starts managing someone else's (state) budget creates such pseudo-problems and then whines that they can't solve them. Ask Milei

Open referenced post
Guntars Vītols (@guntarsv)
APVIENOTAIS SARAKSTS - Latvijas Zaļā partija, Latvijas Reģionu Apvienība, Liepājas partija · Ekonomists (FM ministra birojs)
Reply

@Astridamains Yes, of course. Millions remain in ineffective intermediate layers. But billions are distributed among hundreds of thousands of recipients.

@guntarsv Understand one thing - often the allocated money does not reach the final doer, it stays with the distributors along the way - for managers' fancy salaries, procurements, expenses and services hidden under maintenance, proud cars, the staff of planners and advertisers!

Open referenced post
BudgetBureaucracy
Guntars Vītols (@guntarsv)
APVIENOTAIS SARAKSTS - Latvijas Zaļā partija, Latvijas Reģionu Apvienība, Liepājas partija · Ekonomists (FM ministra birojs)
Reply

@andrislov We will first slash everything first. That's how politics, democracy works. And it doesn't matter, in the whole EU or USA. Opposing ideas have no voter. People like me are not elected at all or in no way a majority. Politicians like Milei are elected when it's the absolute end and only then.

Milei took a chainsaw, not telling how much less coffee to drink. He cut ministries, subsidies, parasitism. When will you cut concretely, Mr. Vītols? Not 'we will make everything more efficient and it will affect someone by a few euros'. Which program will be closed first? Which fund? Which ministry? How many 'necessary' positions will be cut? When we slash everything, it will already be too late.

Open referenced post
Budget
Guntars Vītols (@guntarsv)
APVIENOTAIS SARAKSTS - Latvijas Zaļā partija, Latvijas Reģionu Apvienība, Liepājas partija · Ekonomists (FM ministra birojs)
Reply

Mostly some pay taxes, others receive. It's not just here. I've been paying taxes in the private sector for 39+ years. Now I've only been working in the public sector for a few months as an exception. But I've been paying for health services all these years; my money goes to pensioner quotas. It's ok.

@guntarsv I personally haven't used any state services for years - education is paid, medicine is paid. Roads won't be repaired? Police, firefighters will ask for subscription? Primary school will be paid for children?

Open referenced post
BudgetSocial support
Guntars Vītols (@guntarsv)
APVIENOTAIS SARAKSTS - Latvijas Zaļā partija, Latvijas Reģionu Apvienība, Liepājas partija · Ekonomists (FM ministra birojs)
Quote

Coffee cup mathematics. Let's take, for example, a caffe latte for 5 euros. If every person in Latvia received on average a state-paid service less than one lat per month, how much would be saved? 100 million per year. Not everyone drinks such an expensive latte, not everyone needs to have it taken away, I'm not suggesting that, the number is average, for illustration. But 20 unsponsored latte cups per month (one every working day) solves the budget deficit to zero. Remember Argentina's Milei? Chainsaw? He achieved budget balance by reducing public spending by 800 dollars per inhabitant per year. That's 14 caffe lattes per month. He cut ministries in posters, but saved billions in public sector spending. When we have squandered everything, we will do the same, and those undrunk lattes will not cause anything tragic. 20 cups per month.

Regarding budget problems, there are two entrenched myths. First, that budget expenditures can be cut linearly. That is a popular slogan. The second myth is that the problem can be solved by cutting only 'the bad ones', others. Almost always officials are invoked. Both myths are financial illiteracy. The state apparatus can always be made more efficient, anywhere and anytime. 10% or more? Public administration is nowhere, in no country, as efficient as a private company, where profit motive or survival is a natural regulator. In public administration, by definition, such a regulator does not exist, so efficiency gains can only happen through coercion, through reform and dictate. With force, coercion. But that cannot solve the budget deficit. That way you can save some tens of millions, leaving 2000 million of deficit. Large sums go to the public sector (300+ thousand employees - police, doctors, teachers, soldiers). And together they are billions. Then the social sphere is funded with 6 billion, the majority of society. Those sums are not large individually, but there are many recipients - that's where the billions come from. If we really want to solve the problem at its root, we need to improve efficiency across all spheres as a whole, look at where it is truly needed, where there are inefficiencies. But that is guaranteed to affect some of us personally, even by a few euros. And that will never be popular, that is the most essential problem, the root of the political problem. Almost no country in the world can solve this.

Open referenced post
Budget
Guntars Vītols (@guntarsv)
APVIENOTAIS SARAKSTS - Latvijas Zaļā partija, Latvijas Reģionu Apvienība, Liepājas partija · Ekonomists (FM ministra birojs)
Tweet

Regarding budget problems, there are two entrenched myths. First, that budget expenditures can be cut linearly. That is a popular slogan. The second myth is that the problem can be solved by cutting only 'the bad ones', others. Almost always officials are invoked. Both myths are financial illiteracy. The state apparatus can always be made more efficient, anywhere and anytime. 10% or more? Public administration is nowhere, in no country, as efficient as a private company, where profit motive or survival is a natural regulator. In public administration, by definition, such a regulator does not exist, so efficiency gains can only happen through coercion, through reform and dictate. With force, coercion. But that cannot solve the budget deficit. That way you can save some tens of millions, leaving 2000 million of deficit. Large sums go to the public sector (300+ thousand employees - police, doctors, teachers, soldiers). And together they are billions. Then the social sphere is funded with 6 billion, the majority of society. Those sums are not large individually, but there are many recipients - that's where the billions come from. If we really want to solve the problem at its root, we need to improve efficiency across all spheres as a whole, look at where it is truly needed, where there are inefficiencies. But that is guaranteed to affect some of us personally, even by a few euros. And that will never be popular, that is the most essential problem, the root of the political problem. Almost no country in the world can solve this.

BudgetBureaucracy
Guntars Vītols (@guntarsv)
APVIENOTAIS SARAKSTS - Latvijas Zaļā partija, Latvijas Reģionu Apvienība, Liepājas partija · Ekonomists (FM ministra birojs)
Reply

I have proposals in mind. What millions or 10 can be saved. By eliminating ministries, you transfer functions to another, the savings are only a small part of the administration staff. If you save at all. An example is the territorial reform, now there are fewer municipalities, fewer deputies and their salaries. But the total number of employees in municipal administration has grown. It can happen the same with ministries if you optimize inefficiently.

@guntarsv @u_osis What's wrong with eliminating some ministries? At first there were state ministers, then they turned into ministries, just to maintain proportionality for the coalition.

Open referenced post
BudgetBureaucracy
Guntars Vītols (@guntarsv)
APVIENOTAIS SARAKSTS - Latvijas Zaļā partija, Latvijas Reģionu Apvienība, Liepājas partija · Ekonomists (FM ministra birojs)
Retweet

I agree that 'attempts to patch the system with linear budget cuts and loud slogans alone will fail.' In my opinion, the next coalition must have one specific iron law that stands above everything else. Automatically, by default, do not consider any proposals that require more money next year compared to this year. The opposite is to deny the 'zero budget' principle as such. Instead, it's 'just pile on more,' which has always been the case so far. If this one principle is followed, new initiatives will have to be funded from internal resources, streamline processes, eliminate the unnecessary. Only that way.

Open referenced post
Budget
Guntars Vītols (@guntarsv)
APVIENOTAIS SARAKSTS - Latvijas Zaļā partija, Latvijas Reģionu Apvienība, Liepājas partija · Ekonomists (FM ministra birojs)
Reply

I agree that 'attempts to patch the system with linear budget cuts and loud slogans alone will fail.' In my opinion, the next coalition must have one specific iron law that stands above everything else. Automatically, by default, do not consider any proposals that require more money next year compared to this year. The opposite is to deny the 'zero budget' principle as such. Instead, it's 'just pile on more,' which has always been the case so far. If this one principle is followed, new initiatives will have to be funded from internal resources, streamline processes, eliminate the unnecessary. Only that way.

The Saeima elections are at the door. Who to vote for? I don't really know, because politicians' declarations have again clashed with socio-economic physics, mathematics, and logic. Probably for the lesser evil. But which one exactly? For years I've been saying that the 'comfortable stagnation' and institutional inertia cultivated for years are exhausted. But are they really exhausted? The state administration continues to function as a clumsy conveyor of regulations without feedback. Through the flood of Cabinet of Ministers regulations, it continues to automatically grow civil servant positions and bureaucratic barriers, while political responsibility dissolves in collegial decisions. This internal incapacity is made even sharper by the geopolitical background. Here, security demands immediate, asymmetric efficiency, not peacetime procurement procedures and other decision-making processes' dawdling. But maybe, finally, the time has come for good changes we all hope for? Let's see what we can actually hope for in the Saeima election atmosphere from the speeches and articles of the most popular parties (about 'Progressive' and parties representing the Russian-speaking electorate, we'll need a separate conversation). In the pre-election debates, as I would formulate them, three different main narratives dominate: The radical libertarian restart (Alvis Hermanis and MMN), which offers a brutal 'chainsaw' approach — reducing the number of ministries and civil servants by 15%–50%, 'zero budget', massive deregulation, and citizen involvement through capital markets. The pragmatic technocratic direction (Kulberga line, AS, LA), which also focuses on process audits, the 'one in, two out' principle in bureaucracy, and depoliticization and listing of state-owned companies (like airBaltic, Latvenergo) on the stock exchange. The populist 'strong leader' narrative (LPV, Ainārs Šlesers), which appeals to the public's emotional hunger for rapid growth. They offer to centralize state governance and grand investment projects, but don't delve into such 'details' as implementation mechanisms and fiscal constraints. The central flaw of all these declarations is the ignorance of stark reality. The 2.5% GDP growth touted by politicians is no market breakthrough. It's a typical 'war Keynesianism' illusion — the economy is kept afloat by state defense spending (over 1.1 billion euros or over 3%–3.5% of GDP) and borrowed budget funds, while private exports and business investments (apart from luxury Porsches and BMWs that fill Riga's streets) stagnate. With economic productivity at only 55.8% of the EU average and stagnating foreign investment, promises of 'doubled prosperity' and simultaneous tax cuts without a structural base change (low added value and productivity) are mathematically incompatible. The fiscal framework also allows no maneuvering, because defense commitments, rising state debt servicing costs, and the social burden of an aging society prevent simultaneously ensuring a 0% budget deficit and massive tax cuts. So, my dear, it's a dead end. In a regional breakdown, more than 80% of foreign capital is concentrated in Riga and Pierīga, while municipal fragmentation and low capacity, which I've also been talking about for years, make the periphery unable to lift any significant production projects. Meanwhile, in healthcare and social sphere, the introduction of a 'free market' hits an acute shortage of medics and a terrifying demographic hole. The next government will inevitably have to admit that attempts to patch the system with linear budget cuts and loud slogans alone will fail. So that it doesn't seem like I'm unfairly painting Latvia's bright future hopes in black colors, I will next examine the illusory attempts of parties to solve problems in more detail. Even later - what socio-economic physics, mathematics, and logic actually require to be done (which I've also been talking about for years). Have a nice last working day of the week!

Open referenced post
BudgetBureaucracy
Māris Kučinskis (@MarisKucinskis)
APVIENOTAIS SARAKSTS - Latvijas Zaļā partija, Latvijas Reģionu Apvienība, Liepājas partija · Finanšu ministrs
Tweet

Today a valuable conversation with entrepreneurs working at @salduslv about business development in Latvia's regions, tax policy, current government work issues, and other important questions for the region and the country as a whole. https://t.co/GqqN1c9yQf

Budget
Māris Kučinskis (@MarisKucinskis)
APVIENOTAIS SARAKSTS - Latvijas Zaļā partija, Latvijas Reģionu Apvienība, Liepājas partija · Finanšu ministrs
Tweet

I am convinced that the people working and living in local governments know best about work and life there. It is valuable to meet entrepreneurs who create added value and attract investments to the regions. This time I am pleased to visit companies operating in @salduslv https://t.co/i9nfb8LzpC

Investments
Māris Kučinskis (@MarisKucinskis)
APVIENOTAIS SARAKSTS - Latvijas Zaļā partija, Latvijas Reģionu Apvienība, Liepājas partija · Finanšu ministrs
Tweet

The municipal financing equalization model, the possibility for municipalities to more effectively finance their development projects, and many other issues were discussed today with the leadership of the @salduslv council – @MarisZusts and his colleagues. Thanks for the meeting and productive conversation! https://t.co/gNfbeFf5JI

BudgetInvestments
Andris Kulbergs (@AndrisKulbergs)
APVIENOTAIS SARAKSTS - Latvijas Zaļā partija, Latvijas Reģionu Apvienība, Liepājas partija · Ministru prezidents
Tweet

I have discussed the issue of grain transportation with Ukraine's Prime Minister Serhij Koreckis and President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Ukraine's services have information about grain illegally taken out of Ukraine by Russia, which is planned to be exported through the Baltics in large volumes in the near future. We must immediately use this to strengthen Latvia's transit control system. We have agreed that Ukrainian food processing and safety experts will come to Latvia, and Ukrainian special services will also be involved. Ukraine, in cooperation with the United Kingdom, has created a database and solution for verifying grain origin. No one knows their grain's origin, producers, documents and possible illegal export routes better than Ukraine's institutions. We do not need to reinvent what Ukraine already knows and does best. At the same time, the interests of Latvian farmers must be strongly defended. This year's harvest must finally get a respite after three very hard years. Although there are currently no concerns about Latvia's port capacity, Latvian farmers' products must have priority access to our railways and ports. Therefore I have instructed the port administrations and state company "Latvijas dzelzceļš" to ensure that agricultural products of Latvian origin, including grain, receive logistics priority. https://t.co/xYSIsrcqlS

Agriculture / ForestsInfrastructure